[scribus] Krita Kickstarter

JLuc jluc at no-log.org
Tue Jul 15 22:15:36 UTC 2014


Hello

As for scribus, you might be better of looking
at http://bugs.scribus.net/roadmap_page.php
since it has been thoroughfully updated.

Cezary has stoped developpement due to a job change.
His work has partly been merged and still needs quite heavy debuging
since himself couldnt sort out the various crashes that happen
when using his code.

As for ale, you can follow his works on the epub importer
on his github repo :
https://github.com/aoloe/scribus-plugin-export-epub/commits/master

There have been around 100 commits in june, mostly bugfixes
http://scribus.net/websvn/log.php?repname=Scribus&max=100
It's nice to feel the bugs disappear
and have scribus improve stability and usability.

JLuc


Le 15/07/2014 19:36, Alexandre Prokoudine a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Kunda Loves Scribus wrote:
>
>> Truly, there are some inspiring examples so far where a project with
>> organized structure and a well-planned roadmap have been pretty victorious
>> with their fundraising efforts. I'm thinking of Synfig specifically. Pitivi
>> and Mediagoblin (2 crowdfundings already) have had pretty successful runs
>> but I'm not sure how they've been evolving since.
>
> Synfig is in the "it's complicated" department. Every time they run a
> campaign, it's a close call for failure: half the time they are mere
> hours away from either failing or succeeding. They do deliver on their
> promises, but due to having to pick a feature request to focus on for
> the next month of sponsored development they have a problem of
> wrapping up and actually releasing all the awesome new features they
> have implemented (sounds familiar, eh?). In fact, they made a summer
> break for July and August, so that might help.
>
> Mediagoblin had two campaigns: the one in late 2012 was underfunded by
> ca. 25%, the one in 2014 was overfunded by 5%. The first time things
> balanced out, because they got more people involved through other
> programs. I'm not sure how much progress they've had since April 2014,
> when they last posted in the blog, I think someone could ping Chris
> about that :)
>
> Pitivi is still in the process of being funded. Last time I checked (a
> month ago) they were half way there or so. They made some rather
> important changes anyway, but they rarely report on the progress
> which, IMO, is one of the reasons of the slow progress with the
> funding (IMO, Synfig, being a bit of a niche product, only manages to
> raise funds every time, because they post weekly updates with videos
> and release dev builds. Pitivi guys do not provide this kind of
> progress visibility, although they do provide static nightly builds)
>
> Not sure how much useful that info is :) Frankly, I don't exactly
> understand what's up with Scribus development. Cezary used to be
> hyperactive :), but now he's gone? Alessandro and Klaudia used to work
> on usability, no idea what happened to that project: the properties
> palette is still a huge mess. A_l_e seems to be working on the epub
> exporter which is important for single-sourcing though.
>
> http://wiki.scribus.net mentions "Latest release: Devel 1.5.0" which
> leads to an empty folder on SourceForge. That's confusing.
>
> http://wiki.scribus.net/canvas/1.5.0_(%3D_1.6.0_Alpha_1)_Roadmap lists
> pending features that don't look critical at all while delaying
> delivery of the release.
>
> http://wiki.scribus.net/canvas/Scribus_1.5.0_Release_Schedule mentions
> a bunch of features that are due to be extensively tested, but how
> that could be done without widely accessible binary builds I have no
> foggiest idea.
>
> Alex
>
> ___
> Scribus Mailing List: scribus at lists.scribus.net
> Edit your options or unsubscribe:
> http://lists.scribus.net/mailman/listinfo/scribus
> See also:
> http://wiki.scribus.net
> http://forums.scribus.net
>





More information about the scribus mailing list