[scribus] Problem...

[john Culleton]

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:00:58 -0600
Mike Sleger <chappa-ai at q.com> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Mike Sleger wrote:
> 
> > On Sep 30, 2011, at 11:56 AM, john Culleton wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:25:47 -0400
> >> Oleksandr Moskalenko <malex at scribus.net> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:17 PM, john Culleton wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Now why doesn't the download page say that more clearly? I don't
> >>>> have a good answer. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> John Culleton
> >>>> Wexford Press
> >>>> "Create Book Covers with Scribus"
> >>>> http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html
> >>> 
> >>> John,
> >>> 
> >>> I updated the information on the Download page at
> >>> http://wiki.scribus.net/canvas/Download. Please check it out and
> >>> leave your comments.
> >> 
> >> Exactly put. Now I hope newcomers will heed the message!
> >> 
> >> I would rearrange the page somewhat, putting the pointers to
> >> 1.4.0rc together and right under the 1.3.3.14 download pointers.
> >> This means putting the 1.4.0 svn and the 1.4.0 tarball right under
> >> "Read instructions for Debian/Ubuntu Linux Package archive access."
> >> 
> >> The overall page sequence would be:
> >> All the 1.3.3.14 stuff
> >> All the 1.4.0 stuff
> >> All the 1.5.0 stuff
> > 
> > I would arrange the versions so the latest ones are at the top of
> > the list and the newer ones at the bottom.  You want the latest
> > information to be the first links a user sees.
> > 
> 
> My bad - I was in a hurry.  The newest versions should be at the top
> of the list, and the older versions should be lowest on the list.
> People shouldn't have to look around for the latest version to
> download - it should be the first download link they see.

If you mean to put 1.4.0 at the top I agree. But I would not put the
development version 1.5.0 at the top.

-- 
John Culleton
Wexford Press
"Create Book Covers with Scribus"
http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html