gregp_ky at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 1 12:07:18 UTC 2011
On 09/30/2011 11:00 PM, Mike Sleger wrote:
>> I would arrange the versions so the latest ones are at the top of the list and the newer ones at the bottom. You want the latest information to be the first links a user sees.
> My bad - I was in a hurry. The newest versions should be at the top of the list, and the older versions should be lowest on the list. People shouldn't have to look around for the latest version to download - it should be the first download link they see.
The problem is, for example, right now we don't want new users to get
1.5.0, which is a newest version.
We are currently in a transition period, where 22.214.171.124 is the current
stable, yet about to be eclipsed by 1.4.0, which is nearly ready. Once
1.4.0 is ready, then it will remain the stable version and recommended
one for some time.
More information about the scribus