Fri Apr 7 20:56:16 CEST 2006
Peter Nermander wrote:
>> To me, this is one of the confusing things about advice on the list.
>> When people ask about some feature that doesn't exist on 1.2.x they are
>> told to use 1.3.x, but when they complain about some rough edges in
>> 1.3.x, they are told they shouldn't be using 1.3.x for "production work."
> The Scribus project uses a convention (same as Linux kernel if I understand right) that only "even" version are considered stable. "Odd" versions are development versions and their focus is not aimed at stability but improvement.
> So, 1.2 is the current stable version, the next stable version will be 1.4.
I guess what you're suggesting is that the entire series of 1.3.x will
be unstable, then magically 1.4 will be stable?
More information about the scribus