John at T4sLtd.co.uk
Tue Apr 3 22:22:58 UTC 2012
On 03/04/2012 18:54, Craig Bradney wrote:
> On 4/3/12 7:52 PM, John Beardmore wrote:
>> On 03/04/2012 18:45, Craig Bradney wrote:
>>> On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, John Beardmore wrote:
>> So given that windows would really need a completely different
>>mechanism, what would be appropriate and are there any
>> candidates ?
> Why would windows need a different mechanism?
"Mechanism" might not have been the best choice of word. I'm not
suggesting the use of divining rods or anything, but specifically, I
understood that aspell wasn't a contender for windows these days, even
though there had been a port in the past ?
> Not only do I not see why we would need a different
> mechanism, but enchant is (was?) supposed to interface to the
>natively installed system under
> Windows, Linux or OSX, etc.
Good, but at the moment we use aspell on the platforms where it is
supported, rather than enchant ? Or have I misunderstood ?
John Beardmore,MSc EDM (Open),B.A. Chem (Oxon),CMIOSH,CEnv,MIEMA,MEI
Managing Director, T4 Sustainability Limited. http://www.T4sLtd.co.uk/
Registered Office: 181 Belper Road, Stanley Common, Ilkeston. DE7 6FT
Company Reg: 4441097, VAT Number: 797 2239 85, MCS: ELC54087.
Energy Audit, Carbon Management, Design Advice, Sustainable Energy
Consultancy and Installation, Carbon Trust Standard Registered Assessor
Transition Training and Consultancy Energy Resilience Assessor
Phone: 0845 4561332 Mobile: 07785 563116 Skype: t4sustainability
More information about the scribus