[Scribus] Bleeding for bleed ... and stability
Owen
rcook
Wed Mar 26 00:39:50 CET 2008
> Hi all,
>
> I know this has been discussed here recently, but again:
> When I started a 40-page publishing project last summer,
> I wanted to have bleed settings. I got very well along
> by simply doing everything with (then stable) 1.3.3.9
> After everything except bleed settings was done, I imported
> the whole thing into 1.3.4, added the bleed settings
> and was happy. Would this still be the way to go,
> except, of course, that it's 1.3.3.11 now?
>
> Serious problems lay elsewhere last time:
> My document got screwed up, partly due to bad
> PS/PDF from external sources (will know to avoid
> this now), but partly the .sla structure was
> obviously corrupted.
> (I helped it by creating partial documents and
> assembling the resulting PDFs with other tools.)
> From the changelog, it looks like _tons_ of bugs
> have been shaken out between 1.3.3.9 and 1.3.3.11,
> so what's your overall experience in stability
> and document integrity now?
>
> That said, I would just like to thank the developers for
> there work -- it's great software!
>
> Thanks, Martin
Would this be relevant to your problem?
http://wiki.scribus.net/index.php/Bleed%2C_create_markers_and_export_a_document_to_pdf
Owen
More information about the scribus
mailing list