[scribus] mixing rgb and cmyk
martin_tlustos at wycliff.org
Tue Jun 24 21:29:22 CEST 2008
Am Dienstag, 24. Juni 2008 20:02:32 schrieb Craig Ringer:
> Andrew A. Gill wrote:
> > If you intend to print something out, always use CMYK.
> This is not necessarily always the best choice:
> - Many home printers expect RGB input and will do a very poor job when
> fed pre-converted CMYK data. You're better off using an RGB colour
> profile to transform colours for these printers, then let their
> drivers do the CMYK, CcMmYK, etc translation. This is especially
> important for "photo printers" and other six-or-more colour printers,
> as most CMYK spaces cannot represent their full gamut, where a
> wide-gamut RGB space like Adobe RGB is well suited to it.
> - Modern print shops may accept PDF/X-3 with ICC-tagged RGB data. This
> lets you send your data to the print shop in their original colour
> spaces and lets their RIP do the conversion with its often superior
> knowledge of the performance of the press. Unfortunately, many
> print shops will just look at you funny and say "why do you want to
> send RGB?" because they just don't get ICC colour workflows, but
> a few are starting to get it. It doesn't help that ICC workflows are
> hard to get right and somewhat easy to misunderstand.
> For most print shops, though, I agree that sticking to pre-converted
> CMYK is currently the way to go.
> Craig Ringer
Thank you for your advice. So, if I would want to convert an image to cmyk,
what would I use - Cinepaint, Krita, Gimp?
> > software you are using will have to convert to CMYK anyways,
> > because that is what the separations will have to be, and those
> > are the colors of the inks that the printer/press will use, so
> > starting CMYK can only help. The advice for work that is
> > displayed on a computer screen is to stick to RGB, since that is
> > what screens use, but there are benefits to having that be CMYK,
> > as well (for me, the addition of the K channel sort of acts as a
> > separate value channel, which can be useful for brightening an
> > image without introducing color shifts--I would love to see
> > RGBW as a proposed standard).
> > There's also the possibility that it will mask some errors that
> > won't be visible until press time. For example, I went into GIMP
> > and created a red image (255R/0G/0B), imported it into Scribus
> > and created a red box. Both are similar colors, and you might
> > not notice any discrepancy until you get the plates back from the
> > printer and for some reason, you've got both colors scaled back
> > to a 90% linescreen, causing that nice, clean edge on the font to
> > become ragged.
> > So CMYK for print work. RGB for screen work. But above all
> > else, if ot's possible, do not mix.
> scribus mailing list
> scribus at lists.scribus.net
More information about the scribus