[scribus] No real CMYK black possible??
scribus.lists at tisc.de
Mon Jun 23 15:05:08 CEST 2008
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:02:10AM -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
> >> 3.) I tried printing separations, and I got interesting results.
> > It looks like ghostscripts eats some colors.
> That would not be my conclusion. My primary conclusion would be
> user error.
> I cannot account for why the stroke on a box would be one color
> while the fill is another. The only explanation I can give to
> that is that you changed the stroke color, but not the fill.
> This is unlikely to be a PostScript error, and neither is it
> likely to be an error in Ghostscript. Indeed, when I look at the
> SLA file, I see:
> The square labelled ``Black CMYK'' is Black fill, Black stroke
> The square labelled ``Black RGB'' is Black fill, Black RGB stroke
> The square labelled ``Rich Black CMYK'' is Black fill, Rich Black
> (spot) stroke
> The square labelled ``Total Black CMYK'' is Black fill, Total
> Black stroke
Argh! That sounds too reasonable. :-( :-) I'll check that this evening
and report back what I got.
Thanks and sorry for the fuzz,
Tino.oO(Does somebody need tomatoes? I just found two on my eyes...)
"What we nourish flourishes." - "Was wir nähren erblüht."
More information about the scribus