[scribus] No real CMYK black possible??

Tino Schwarze scribus.lists at tisc.de
Mon Jun 23 15:05:08 CEST 2008

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:02:10AM -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote:

> >> 3.) I tried printing separations, and I got interesting results.
> >
> > It looks like ghostscripts eats some colors.
> That would not be my conclusion.  My primary conclusion would be 
> user error.
> I cannot account for why the stroke on a box would be one color 
> while the fill is another.  The only explanation I can give to 
> that is that you changed the stroke color, but not the fill.
> This is unlikely to be a PostScript error, and neither is it 
> likely to be an error in Ghostscript.  Indeed, when I look at the 
> SLA file, I see:
> The square labelled ``Black CMYK'' is Black fill, Black stroke
> The square labelled ``Black RGB'' is Black fill, Black RGB stroke
> The square labelled ``Rich Black CMYK'' is Black fill, Rich Black 
> (spot) stroke
> The square labelled ``Total Black CMYK'' is Black fill, Total 
> Black stroke

Argh! That sounds too reasonable. :-( :-) I'll check that this evening
and report back what I got.

Thanks and sorry for the fuzz,

Tino.oO(Does somebody need tomatoes? I just found two on my eyes...)

"What we nourish flourishes." - "Was wir nähren erblüht."


More information about the scribus mailing list