[scribus] 1.3.5 Windows spelling checker ?
Gora Mohanty
gora at sarai.net
Thu Aug 21 18:15:16 CEST 2008
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:41:26 -0400
"Jeffrey Silverman" <jeffrey.d.silverman at gmail.com> wrote:
> @John Beardmore:
>
> While I understand your perspective and some of your points, overall,
> you are coming across like this:
>
> (Actually, I'm sorry in advance, because you really don't come across
> so persnickity/snotty/immature at all, but I thought it would be
> funnier this way)
[...]
Hmm, I was going to stay out of this debate, as I am
by no stretch of the imagination an expert on page-
layout programs (I use TeX/LaTeX for documents, and
see no reason to change).
However, humorous as your message was, I am quite
non-plussed about the attitude that seems to come
across. My viewpoint is:
(a) The spell-checker plugin is already implemented.
(While I did do the initial work, and would like
to see it not go to waste, I really do not care
one way or the other.)
(b) It is a *plugin*. People can choose to use it or
not, and while I take the point about added work
for core Scribus developers, and possible
instability, the point about code-bloat seems
rather weak.
(c) I also took Louis' point about how spell-checking
modifications can change the flow of the text, but
after pondering on this further, is the same thing
not true in the case when someone decides at the
last moment to replace a certain word, by a more
mellifluous one, or to resize the font. Shall we
disallow resizing, too?
(d) Finally, to me, open-source is all about giving
people the choice. When it intrudes minimally on
the normal application (plugin, use it at your own
risk), I see no reason that Scribus developers
should choose to mandate one mode of working over
another.
Regards,
Gora
More information about the scribus
mailing list