[scribus] ! ;-)

[Lars O. Grobe]

> Are you serious? I think that taking that stance is on the whole more
> potentially harmful to Scribus (or any open source, community-driven
> project) than getting, *and listening to*, some criticism.
> *Especially* criticism you don't like!
>
> Unless you mean abuse. But abuse is not in any way the same as
> criticism. Well, okay, maybe in some surface ways.
>
> But if you can't listen to all the criticism that's out there then I
> understand where JLuc is coming from, even though I don't completely
> agree with him.
>
>   
He did not say that he does not listen to criticism. He just defined the 
boundaries. In the meaning of - if I go to someone's house, take a sit 
and get served a nice dinner, it is ok to share an idea about what wine 
he especially likes to the meal - but claiming that the house is awful 
and the meal cannot be eaten is a bit unpolite. Decide if you like the 
metapher, but noone refused to listen to criticism. That is what a lot 
of people wrote before - critics in a way that they can help improving 
scribus are great. Write down a list of experiences, describing the 
worklflow, where scribus could fit into it and where not, track bugs, 
make suggestions that fit into scribus - all cool things to do. But if 
someone claims that scribus is not useable, I wonder how he can be a 
scribus user. And this is a scribus user mailing list...

CU Lars.

CU Lars.