[Scribus] Is 1.3.4 stable enough

Louis Desjardins louis.desjardins
Wed Oct 17 15:54:58 CEST 2007

2007/10/17, Stewart Noy <windrunner at mweb.co.za>:
> Gregory Pittman wrote:
> >
> > If you can get 1.3.5svn up and running, you might make your book in
> >
> > or, then load a copy into 1.3.5svn (or 1.3.4) to see how it
> > looks. A big issue with the transition to 1.3.4+ is a different handling
> > of text and styles.
> >
> >
> What's the point of opening a file in 1.3.4 though, as it looks
> nothing like the original in especially if you have a lengthy
> book
> with large amounts of text. There will be some substantial work to do in
> getting it to look like the original.

It's mostly to get the feel of what's ahead. It can be a good test file as
well and it can help feed the testers channel. I don't think it is worth
trying to get the file look like the original. For a part of it, though, it
might be interesting to know how it went. Mainly (I should write, only!) for
testing purposes, which in fact is of great help, whenever possible.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20071017/e9918d16/attachment.html 

More information about the scribus mailing list