[Scribus] Character-by-character placement in PDF
Thu Oct 20 20:10:11 CEST 2005
Craig Ringer wrote:
> Gregory Pittman wrote:
>> Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> Gregory Pittman wrote:
>>>> Let me offer this observation. If there is a more or less absolute
>>>> need for efficiency of this type, consider that all of the
>>>> pertinent text information is really contained in the Scribus .sla
>>>> file. This file can be transmitted with a lot less overhead,
>>>> especially if you're just talking about text. There are only two
>>>> requirements on the receiving end -- a working copy of Scribus
>>>> compatible with the Scribus file type (1.2.x vs 1.3.x), and the
>>>> correct fonts (though subs can be done in a pinch).
>>> Honestly, I don't think that's realistic. PDF is a widely used and
>>> supported standard, and increasingly it's all that printers want to
>>> accept. The printers I deal with don't accept QuarkXPress or
>>> InDesign documents anymore (good on 'em); the chances of a printer
>>> taking Scribus docs are near zero.
>> I was trying to get a sense of where the question was coming from,
>> and not suggesting an alternative to PDF. I don't think Phil was
>> suggesting modifying the PDF format, or suggesting that printers
>> would accept anything else, and it's pretty clear why Scribus makes
> I'm a bit confused, to be honest. Your message certainly reads to me
> as if you're suggesting that they should just send the Scribus doc to
> the printer instead of using PDF. I find it difficult to see any other
> interpretation. That's not a bad thing, though I don't agree with the
> suggestion. However, if that wasn't your intent, I'm a bit confused as
> to what was.
I'm so confused by your responses that I just don't know where to even
start, so I guess that's the end of it.
More information about the scribus