[Scribus] Quark user's questions
Jan Ulrich Hasecke
Thu Jan 27 12:07:41 CET 2005
John Kershaw wrote:
> Nor am I talking about slavishly following Quark/ID
> interface/method/whatever. But Quark stole the market from Aldus
> because it 'fitted' more closely how people expected things to work.
> Quark, after a lot of use, feels like hand in glove. You think it,
> you do it. It mimics how you would do stuff if you were working with
> paper cutouts on a real pasteboard. That's why people like it. Golly,
> they must do to learn all the myriad shortcuts! I'm saying there are
> things that Quark/ID do right - there's a reason people spend all
> that cash purchasing them. (Which is not to say there aren't lots of
> things that should be avoided).
This may be true at a certain time. But all designstudios I know does
not spend a single paid minute to evalute things. They use Quark,
because "everybody" uses it. They don't pay their employees to learn a
new programm, they don't pay freelancers to learn a new programm when
they come in to help out. It is the same thing as with M$Office. They
all use word, because all use word even if word regulary killed their
work when the deadline comes near.
I see designers restart their Mac ten times a day and more, because
Quark segfaults or the network was down or whatever. They don't get
their work done because their tools are worse than windows apps from M$.
I think that we will see a lot of improvements in scribus in the near
future, I hope that scribus will not simply follow the Quark or Indesign
path but the best path to achieve your aim: making a terrfic artwork in
the most intuitive _and_ efficient way. And therefore I think all hints
from users of other programs are more than welcome.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20050127/707866ef/attachment.pgp
More information about the scribus