[Scribus] Documentation

[Gregory Pittman]

Craig Bradney wrote:

>On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 17:26, Gregory Pittman wrote:
>  
>
>>I think we can all understand the size of the job of updating the 
>>documentation for Scribus.  What I am wondering is why the documentation 
>>isn't being done and made available in some kind of modular format, 
>>especially considering the ever-changing nature of the CVS version.
>>    
>>
>Well.. if theres no docs.. ask, or play and learn.. 
>
>Meanwhile.. we are in the process of rewriting those docs and creating a
>new website for them, to be released with 1.2. (as has been said before
>on the list! more than once!)
>
>Some features arent finished yet, or finished between developers
>releases.. why should we write user docs for an unfinished feature.... 
>
>Please.. 
>
>Craig
>  
>
I'm asking, I'm playing, I'm learning, I'm playing...

<butmoreseriously>
My counterpoint would be two things,
1. If Scribus itself were released after it was 'done', it wouldn't be
out yet.
2. It's possible that in the process of writing about a feature, one can
realize, 'you know, that's not really the way it should be...'
</butmoreseriously>
I love this program!

Greg P