Mon May 24 01:27:10 CEST 2004
Craig Bradney wrote:
>On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 17:26, Gregory Pittman wrote:
>>I think we can all understand the size of the job of updating the
>>documentation for Scribus. What I am wondering is why the documentation
>>isn't being done and made available in some kind of modular format,
>>especially considering the ever-changing nature of the CVS version.
>Well.. if theres no docs.. ask, or play and learn..
>Meanwhile.. we are in the process of rewriting those docs and creating a
>new website for them, to be released with 1.2. (as has been said before
>on the list! more than once!)
>Some features arent finished yet, or finished between developers
>releases.. why should we write user docs for an unfinished feature....
I'm asking, I'm playing, I'm learning, I'm playing...
My counterpoint would be two things,
1. If Scribus itself were released after it was 'done', it wouldn't be
2. It's possible that in the process of writing about a feature, one can
realize, 'you know, that's not really the way it should be...'
I love this program!
More information about the scribus