<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-forward-container">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div id="gt-res-content">
<div id="gt-res-dir-ctr" dir="ltr"
class="trans-verified-button-small"><span id="result_box"
class="" lang="en"><span class="">What do you do if you have
to work with transparent elements?<br>
<br>
</span></span></div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">2017-09-22 23:25 keltezéssel, Bert
Driehuis írta:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAN0x2A_1BqcmGuWXpeLL4pekh4NMcYJM55h22kG0wYEHqH4COA@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">Dear Peter,
just to confirm: that is exactly what I do. PDF/X is probably
overrated. The reason why professional printers do not like PDF 1.x is
that there are too many tools out there that produces non-conforming
PDF. Scribus normally produces good PDF (if you use good fonts and do
not enable problematic features like knockout and transparency).
Exporting as PDF 1.3 makes sure you do not accidentally enable
transparency, for example by including a PNG with transparency without
noticing, which is why I recommend using PDF 1.3. It supports CMYK
just fine.
With kind regards,
Bert
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:40 PM, benedek <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:benedek_peter@upcmail.hu" moz-do-not-send="true"><benedek_peter@upcmail.hu></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Bert
Thank you very much for your help.
Do I understand correctly? You send PDF 1.3 file to the print house?
So you use it? : Input in document cmyk colorspace pictures and output PDF
1.3 and outline font.
This seems a good idea.
I'm going to try it. Perhaps this will succeed.
Thank you very much indeed.
Regards
Peter
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>