<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Mar 28, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Sveinn í Felli wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><br>So many software projects are struggling these days to squeeze their<br>interfaces into usable netbook/tablet formats; mostly by degrading<br>usability for those who use *real* computers and *adequate*<br>screen-estate.<br><br>I sincerely hope Scribus won't go that route - after all it is a<br>layout/typesetting software.</span></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div><div>I feel that you should fear not. Modern software applications give the user the ability to change the interface to suit them, whether they use a "real" computer or a less-than-real computer.</div><div><br></div><div>If this change were made, you'd be able to have all the chrome you want; others would be able to turn off chrome they don't need.</div><div><br></div><div>dcat</div></body></html>