<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18943">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face="Palatino Linotype">What would be the benefit of adding
imposition to Scribus? As a former owner of a printshop, I can tell you that
<U>every</U> printer who can print a spread has the tools in his workflow to do
the imposition. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Palatino Linotype">"Camera ready" means the <EM>page</EM> is
exactly the way you want it. The printer takes it from there. If he's running a
20" press it'll be one imposition, if a 26" another, 36" another and 40" yet
another. I sincerely doubt the printer would want you to impose the pages.
Now if you're talking about imposition on a copy machine, Adobe Reader already
has the firepower to do that.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Palatino Linotype">I hope the developers aren't asked to spend
their valuable time on adding this function of dubious value at the expense of
other important improvements. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Palatino Linotype">Thank you Scribus developers for making
available this software!</FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Palatino Linotype">Tom Connolly</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>