[scribus] [Scribus] newline issue in pdf fields
Hans-Peter Jansen
hpj at urpla.net
Sun May 1 20:09:14 UTC 2011
Hi Greg, hi a.l.e,
On Sunday 01 May 2011, 14:11:45 Gregory Pittman wrote:
> On 05/01/2011 06:39 AM, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > Hi a.l.e,
> >
> > first of all, thanks for your attention.
> >
> > On Sunday 01 May 2011, 11:06:09 a.l.e wrote:
> >> hi pete,
> >>
> >>> Much more
> >>> importantly, the line break handling changed (again):
> >>> now all test fields add a newline in front of each line in the
> >>> resulting pdf (in the drop down _and_ the text fields), but OTOH,
> >>> the text including newlines is displayed just fine in scribus
> >>> itself.
> >>>
> >>> A minor issue is the vertical text alignment in the single line
> >>> text fields (now top, centered before).
> >>>
> >>> It would be very kind, if somebody could have a look into these
> >>> issues, especially into the newline handling.
> >>
> >> i've tried to replicate but since i don't have your font
> >> installed, i don't see exactly what you see on your monitor...
> >>
> >> can you exactly describe one of the problems? (one single text
> >> which is wrong how can i see that it is wrong...)
> >
> > If you compare the two pdfs, you will notice, that some multiline
> > fields display a plus in the down right corner for the 1.4 version,
> > meaning the field carries some cropped lines, while the correct
> > version displays all lines. Since this also happens for the drop
> > down items, I believe, that scribus converts newlines from
> > multiline text fields into a form that results in one _additional_
> > linefeed per line, when displayed as PDF. Since scribus itself
> > displays the text just fine (without additional linefeeds), this
> > seems also unintentional.
> >
> > Conclusion: the newline normalization for PDFs must be wrong (while
> > 1.3.3.4 got it right).
>
> Scribus never adds newlines. What there has been is a difference in
> how the first line in a text frame displays, which results in its
> baseline being farther from or nearer to the top of the frame. In
> some cases, there may also be some changes in the font that do this.
> In these situations it's hard to know which is "correct", but mainly
> leads to some editing when a file might be loaded from an older
> version. Minute changes in font size can help, or possibly shifting a
> font a bi from the baseline.
Attached are screenshots from areas, where the different spacing is
obvious. Forgive my ignorance, but looking at the menu appearance with
each menu item taking twice the space now it is pretty intriguing
(compare test-pdf-menu.png with test-pdf-menu-1.4.png).
The font in question is called Arial, and being one of the most often
used non serif fonts out there shouldn't suffer from failures in this
dimension (the document, while being creating under Linux must cope
with the environment of windows users without visual distortions).
If you compare test-pdf.png and test-pdf-1.4.png, you see, that it's not
only the first line, but any line, and results in vertical space of 5
lines, that is occupied by ~ 2 lines now with huge gaps in between.
The exact history of the two sla files in this thread are:
transport-order-test.{sla,pdf} were derived from a production document
with 1.3.3.4 yesterday. Then I replaced scribus 1.3.3.4 with 1.4.0-rc3,
loaded the sla, saved it as transport-order-test-1.4.sla without
further manipulations and generated transport-order-test-1.4.pdf from
it. Hence just scribus was replaced in the equation, same system, same
fonts, same everything else.
Interestingly, the difference in vertical line spacing only occurs for
pdf _widgets_, either editable or the pull down menu. Simple text
frames are rendered _identical_ (see "Versender"). Just load both PDFs
into AR, select Receiver One from pull down and tab into the next
widget in both documents. Now you can switch between the two documents
and the differences are obvious. At least I hope so.
Thanks for your patience,
Pete
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test-pdf-1.4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6930 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20110501/fa4c3f2e/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test-pdf.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9713 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20110501/fa4c3f2e/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test-pdf-menu-1.4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10925 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20110501/fa4c3f2e/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test-pdf-menu.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5270 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20110501/fa4c3f2e/attachment-0003.png>
More information about the scribus
mailing list