[Scribus] Is 1.3.4 stable enough

Thu Oct 18 19:33:23 CEST 2007

Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2007 11:11:40 schrieb Gregor:
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
>   <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
>   <title></title>
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> Gregory Pittman pravi:
> <blockquote cite="mid:47161450.2020806 at iglou.com" type="cite">
>   <pre wrap="">Stewart Noy wrote:
>   </pre>
>   <pre wrap=""><!---->Exactly my point. Nonetheless we have seen and will
> continue to see those who, despite being advised to wait before using
> 1.3.4+ do it anyway. It seems the best we can do is to try to keep them
> from doing a lot of work in unstable versions only to reach a frustrating
> dead-end and not be able to load the file into the stable version.
> Unfortunately there are many tantalizing elements in the unstable versions,
> which is part of the fatal attraction, I guess.
>
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Scribus mailing list
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
> href="mailto:Scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de">Scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de</a>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
> href="http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/mailman/listinfo/scribus">http://nashi.al
>tmuehlnet.de/mailman/listinfo/scribus</a>
>
>
>   </pre>
> </blockquote>
> As an end user I can tell you what puzzled me into downoloading 1.3.4
> first. <br>
> Mainly it was this article in the feed I'm subscribet to<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
> href="http://www.scribus.net/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=143">http
>://www.scribus.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=143</a><br>
> <br>
> It's written "release" no mention about beta or test, dev or anything
> similar. No warning it is not meant for production ...<br>
> It has a nice looking round version number and even a name so ...
> everyone who reads this thinks it's THE release :)<br>
> And it is the almost latest news on the site ... (funny, noone mentions
> .1.3.5 or even 1.3.3.10)<br>
> <br>
> I think if you make some changes to this article, less people will be
> puzzled by the 1.3.4<br>
> And it's not bad idea to get the news updated ... <br>
> The web site is the first thing end users look at, cvs, mail list ...
> comes later, when something gets wrong ;)<br>
> <br>
> Gregor<br>
> </body>
> </html>

Gregor,

please don't send HTML emails to mailing lists. They're hard to read for the 
majority of subscribers.

Thanks in advance

Christoph