[Scribus] Scribus Logo (icon) - License?
Ludi Maciel
iludi
Sat Jan 6 17:30:30 CET 2007
On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:45, Branko Vukelic wrote:
> On Saturday 06. January 2007. 00:14, Ludi Maciel wrote:
> > I'm aware of that Branko.
> > Thanks anyway.
>
> Hehe, guess I missed my own point there. :)
Don't worry :) I didn't explain this correctly, my bad.
>
> > > > Please, I need to know whether the logo is copyrighted or not
>
> My guess is that it is not public doman. That is to say that the logo is
> most certainly copyrighted. That's what I wanted to say.
>
> > So, the logo is under ______ lincense.
>
> I checked Wikipedia.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Scribus_logo.png
>
> There is no information on the license under which the logo is published.
>
> On the Scribus Wiki page, the content (of the Wiki project) is said to be
> available under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, but no
> specific info about the logo's own license.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Scribus_logo.png
(See the template {{icon}} in the Licesing section)
"Quoting
This is an icon of copyrighted computer software. It is believed that the
exhibition of icons
to illustrate or identify the computer software in question
on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by
the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,
qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of
this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See
Wikipedia:Fair use and Copyrights.
To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as
described on Wikipedia:Image description page, as well as the source of the
work and copyright information."
"qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law" Wikipedia Commoms
don't allow "fair use", and I don't know why.
Wikipedia Commoms store all files uploaded from the Wikipedia in Portuguese
(and in other languages but English, I guess).
I'm updating the page to match with its English version. Some consistency
between different languages is always good, furthermore, the old version was
totally messed up.
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scribus
And while we are here, I call all <strike>translators</strike> localizators to
do the same (update the Scribus entry in Wikipedia).
Thank you.
Ludi
More information about the scribus
mailing list