[Scribus] this whole wiki thing
Fri Feb 4 12:54:22 CET 2005
On Friday 04 February 2005 12:17, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:48:06AM +0100, Craig Bradney wrote:
> > On Friday 04 February 2005 11:24, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:30:09AM +0100, Craig Bradney wrote:
> > > > On Friday 04 February 2005 08:44, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
> > > > > Other question: Why a by-nc instead of by-sa? It will get a problem
> > > > > for publishers using parts of the docs.
> > > >
> > > > Exactly the idea.
> > >
> > > Then we should include parts of the wiki into the Scribus package.
> > We already include Scribus documentation in the package.. which we intend
> > to be different to that on the wiki.
> Sorry, I meant:
> Then we should not include parts of the wiki into the Scribus package.
> The by-nc is considered incompatible by the Debian staff and we surely
> would get problems with that.
> And if we can't include the docs from the wiki, then the wiki makes less
Its only Debian with its interesting ideas that does this. The Debian 1.2.1
version of Scribus already does not include the documentation but there is a
documentation package in the non-free packages of Debian. All the other
distros are quite happy to package as we do.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20050204/016b32ce/attachment.pgp
More information about the scribus