[scribus-dev] correction needed recent commit r19543

[Kunda Loves Scribus]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:46 AM, "Christoph Schäfer" <
christoph-schaefer at gmx.de> wrote:

>
> And? Neither the bugtracker nor the commit list need to follow the rules
> of bureaucracy. Moreover, the developer mailing list and Mantis do record
> any changes reliably (let alone svn). Please don't try to turn Scribus into
> the equivalent of a public agency with obligatory, voluminous and
> unnecessary paper trails.
>
> You can be pedantic when it comes to Scribus itself, or licensing issues
> (I'm infamous for doing so), but we cannot waste our time by introducing
> bureaucratic rules that may suffocate development.
>
> Also: Please use Plain Text, not HTML, for your ML postings.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Christoph
>  *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 30. September 2014 um 00:18 Uhr
> *Von:* "Kunda Loves Scribus" <scribus.user at gmail.com>
> *An:* "Scribus Dev Mailing List" <scribus-dev at lists.scribus.net>
> *Betreff:* [scribus-dev] correction needed recent commit r19543
>  Commit message for r19543 is actually #12733 and not #2733
>
> /Kunda
>  _______________________________________________ scribus-dev mailing list
> scribus-dev at lists.scribus.net
> http://lists.scribus.net/mailman/listinfo/scribus-dev
>
Hi Christoph,

re: Plain text
I'm usually thinking about such things. Honestly, I'm not fully used to
using this type of ML technology. Sometimes switching from between
different types of lists that exist today can cause some forgetfulness.
These are things that I try to pay attention to as best as possible as
well. As for responding in pure text I need to examine gmail further to see
if I can specify that. Will look in to it. I'm pretty sure that reply to
this email will _not_ send it in plain text. For just this moment forgive
me for doing so.

re: bureaucracy
I see. Given your response I can feel that this is an important issue for
you and therefore I'm noting your position on it for future considerations.
Though I am pretty certain that my intention for pointing out what I was
pointing out was purely out of 'future friendly' concern. In other words,
to be able to correctly and efficiently track down the correct revisions
based on the commit message. Also, I was following the intelligent behavior
that has been modeled and that I've learned to appreciate existing in the
SVN commit process.

Just to be clear, I have no intention of asserting my ego, quirks, or
privileges on anybody let alone 'suffocate development' or introduce
unneeded protocols. I, just like all of us who participate, want to see
Scribus succeed.

Now if you see behavior that you'd prefer me to reflect on and change I
would be willing to listen and examine your feedback.

I am in agreement with you to keep Scribus as free as possible from
bureaucracy.

Thank you,
/Kunda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus-dev/attachments/20140930/4e44dcda/attachment.html>