[scribus-dev] Scribus versioning

[Craig Bradney]

On 6/7/10 10:41 PM, Gregory Pittman wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 09:42 PM, Craig Bradney wrote:
>> On 6/6/10 11:23 PM, a.l.e wrote:
>>> hi
>>>
>>>
>>>> What do you think about changing the *release* versioning to 1.4 Beta
>>>> 1 (=1.3.8) and 1.4 Beta 2 (=1.3.9)?
>>>>
>>>> Internal build numbers should be irrelevant, and changing the version
>>>> number would help us to get rid of the confusing 1.3.x denotations:
>>>>
>>>> - 1.3.3.14 (dead)
>>>> - 1.4 (Beta until officially released)
>>>> - 1.5svn (Experimental until it becomes 1.6 or 2.0 Beta 1)
>>>>
>>> i think that it's not a good idea to have beta version out for
>>> months... google can afford it, but i'm not sure we can...
>>>
>>> imo, 1.3.8 to 1.3.9 are not the problem, the problem is that we
>>> still have 1.3.3.14 as a stable version: we should get rid of it as
>>> soon as possible, not play with names and number schemes.
>
> The only thing I would add is that, with all the confusion we already
> have, we don't help matters by calling the stable version "dead", at
> least on this list or other public forums.

We.. don't.

It is not dead.. but we will only release 1.3.3.15 if we absolutely have
to.. we do not look at that code anymore unless we absolutely need to.

Craig